sabato 19 novembre 2011

David Rockefeller: "The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination"

Angel - Painting of Franco Farina

"The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries”
(David Rockefeller)

Lucas Papademos, Mario Monti….. John Key?

In Greece Lucas Papademos a banker aligned with the international ruling elite has taken over in Greece in what can only be described as an undemocratic coup and the same has happened (As I called it last week) in Italy with the appointment of Mario Monti who appears to be an active international advisor to Goldman Sachs and member of the Bilderberg group.

This is nothing short of the realisation of the Global bankers rule Rockefeller spoke of in his speech in 1991:“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The super-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

-David Rockefeller, Bilderberger meeting, 1991
In light of these developments it is I fear not to much to assume that John Key whose interests in the BofA are in the millions and who has met with Timothy Geithner and Ben Bernanke when last visiting the US will attempt to do the same here as the “Austerity” starts to bite when the banks call in the billions he has borrowed in the last three years.

«Key takes on NZ paper over secret recordingSpot on: Balancing power & deceit!»
The criminalisation of freedom of speech or why “Conspiracy theorists” are dangerous!According to a new article in the Independent “Conspiracy theories” are like a virus and what is worse they are running rampant. To be infected by them turns you into a conspiracy theory spewing zombie and this happens because the virus is spreading on the internet!In fact according to the writer 86%of the US population believe that 911 was an inside job!Now for those of you coming to this site a little longer it must ber clear that I am one of those 86%. I have a serious problem with the official Conspiracy theory namely that 19% young Saudi males with box cutters could hijack 4 planes and fly two of them into the twin towers collapsing three steel reinforced buildings in free fall speed into their own foot print.

For one it breaks all the laws of Physics and that is impossible. I am also firmly in favour of a new and independent investigation into the events of that day.I also have question about the assassination of JF Kennedy and funnily enough that only cam about after I underwent the extra ordinarily painful process I now call my awakening.

To become aware of the truly evil events of 911 and the impossibility of the official CT is contrary to what the writer of the article proposes a painful and long process rather than a simple instant conversion after hearing some vague Conspiracy theories. It takes study, analysis and convincing arguments to even want to consider your government could be so vile as to kill its own citizens in order to go to war.

What is more it is very, very hard work to convince other people to take a look at the material you’ve been studying. It means social isolation and a terrifying loneliness for many who have chosen the path of truth.It is most definetly not the quikest path to making a lot of cool friends.

So why write about the spreading truth about how our leaders are manipulating us as if it is compatible with the sometimes outlandish theories (which by the way is how all science starts. You see something that you can’t explain, develop a theory and set about proving it with scientific data) writers of hit pieces like these always feel is necessary?

Well, Goebels once said that if you tell a lie big enough people will believe it and it takes on average 10 years before people have the courage to question the big lie.If 86% of people in the US believe that 911 was not a job from 19 hapless Saudi’s with box cutters guided by a maniac in an Afghan cave but that it was done by a much more sinister group of people which engineered the events to wage war on entire continents and the 10 year are up as of 911 2011 they have to work really hard to stop this from backfiring becasue if people realise that their leaders are prepared to sacrifice their own citizens for private gain the jig is up.

What better way to make all of us simply asking questions look like violent nut cases and try to marginalise those of us asking question. That way they can lock us away as enemy combatants without trial and disappear us. Maybe not just yet but in the very near future when the OWM meets 911 truth and the two merge!!! So you read it here first. When the international financial situation worsens Either John Key or one of his banking buddies will take over NZ in a “Soft” coup!!!

Helen Waddington Says:
15/11/2011 at 1:58 pm | Reply Rate ThisBrilliant article Ev! That article on the dangers of the virality of “Conspiracy Theories” reeks of the school of thought from Cass Sustein, President Barack Obama’s appointee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs who wrote a 2008 academic paper which advocated “cognitive infiltration” of groups that advocate “conspiracy theories” like the ones surrounding 9/11 and that the government should stealthily infiltrate groups that pose alternative theories on historical events via “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine” those groups.


Nessun commento:

Posta un commento

Nota. Solo i membri di questo blog possono postare un commento.